Sample Essay That Is Pro For the War on Drugs

Sample Essay That Is Pro For the War on DrugsWriting a sample essay that is so for the war on drugs should be a fairly simple task. After all, people don't look forward to the thought of the war on drugs, so it's easy to see why you want to be as pro-drug policy as possible when writing it. However, before you get too carried away with this, there are some things you should know about the topic.First of all, the topic of the essay can be anything that pertains to the drug war. This means that anything that hasn't been in the news recently, such as in the case of the passage of medical marijuana laws, is fine. The point here is that you should be able to relate to the subject matter of the essay, even if you didn't personally participate in it. The essay should not only be about you personally, but about other people involved in the war as well.If you choose to write about your personal experience with the war on drugs, be sure to include a personal opinion on the topic. Being a polit ical essay, the essay has to offer a viewpoint, even if you aren't an expert on the subject. This is where your personal experiences come in. Simply writing about your opinion of the subject is also acceptable.It is a good idea to list some of the positive aspects of the war on drugs in the essay. However, be careful that you do not directly attack the administration or the drug laws. You should try to tone down your criticism as much as possible without losing the overall tone of the essay.The next thing to do is to explain how the drug war affects the community that you live in. In order to do this, it is important to know how the state and the federal government are dealing with the drug problem, and the effects it has on people's lives. You may also be required to prove your research, and the background you have in the area.One of the best ways to demonstrate how the war on drugs harms communities is to name some of the positives that the war has brought to the region. You shoul d be able to relate the negative aspects of the war to what you have written. Of course, you need to make sure that you are able to do this in a way that will not be too difficult for the reader to understand. To illustrate this, you should include excerpts from actual testimonials from the local government officials and residents that are directly related to the topic.Finally, remember that you are writing an essay for the purpose of educating the reader. You should try to give both sides of the argument, and explain both sides of the argument. Be sure to tell the reader whether you think that the war on drugs has actually worked or not. In addition, you should be able to explain how the drug laws would benefit a specific community in the country.Writing an essay that is so for the war on drugs doesn't have to be difficult. You just need to pick a topic that has a lot of potential for discussion. You should be able to provide insights into your opinion that the readers will appreci ate.

A Tale Of Two Cities Charles Dickens (1812-1870) Essays

A Tale of Two Cities Charles Dickens (1812-1870) A Tale of Two Cities Charles Dickens (1812-1870) Type of Work: Historical fiction Setting London and Paris during the French Revolution (1789-1799) Principal Characters Dr. Manette, a French physician, wrongfully imprisoned for 18 years Lucie Manette, his daughter Charles Darnay, a former French aristocrat who has repudiated his title and left France to live in England Jarvis Lorry, the able representative of Tellson Co., a banking house Sydney Carton, a law clerk Madame Defarge, a French peasant and longtime revolutionary Story Overveiw (In the year 1775, King George III sat on the throne of England, preoccupied with his rebellious colonies in America. Across a narrow neck of water to the east, Louis XVI reigned in France, not very much bothered by anything except seeing to his own comforts.) On a cold and foggy night in late November, Mr. Jarvis Lorry was headed out of London bound for Paris, via Dover, on a matter of business. In the darkness of the coach, as he and the other passengers waked and drowsed by turns, Lorry was confronted by a gaunt and ghostly apparition, who engaged him in a silent and macabre conversation The figure haunting him through the night was Dr. Manette, a French physician and the father of Mr. Lorry's young ward. When the doctor had disappeared from his home eighteen years before, his young English wife had diligently and sorrowfully searched for him, until she died two years later, leaving her small daughter Lucie, who was placed in the care of Mr. Lorry. Lorry had brought the child to England, where she was turned over to Lorry's servant, Miss Press, a wild-looking, wonderful woman who adored her. At Dover, Lorry was joined by Lucie - now a young woman - and Miss Press. Lorry informed Lucie that her father had been found alive after years as a political prisoner, and that he, Mr. Lorry, was making this trip to Paris in order to identify him. Lucie, it was hoped, could then help "restore him to life." The sudden reality of finally meeting her father was so great that Lucie could only mutter in an awestricken, doubting voice, "I am going to see his Ghost! It will be his Ghost - not him!" In Paris, Mr. Lorry proceeded directly to the wine-shop of Monsieur Defarge, a former attendant to Dr. Manette, who was now looking after him. The company ascended to the attic. Lucie had been prophetic; indeed, Manette seemed but the ghost of a man, bending over his little shoemaker's bench, unaware of anything around him. Still, together with the free and bewildered Manette, the little group journeyed back to England. Lucie already showed a love and understanding for her long-isolated father, and her companions felt sure she would accomplish the miracle of calling him back to his former self. Five years later, Lucie and her father were called as witnesses in an English court, where a Frenchman, Charles Darnay, was on trial for treason. In the courtroom sat another young man, a lawyer's clerk named Sydney Carton. Carton was immediately struck by the resemblance he and Damay bore to one another, and when a key witness identified the prisoner as the man he had seen gathering information at a dockyard, Carton managed to discredit the witness by calling attention to the fact that in that very courtroom sat another - himself - who could easily be mistaken for the prisoner. The jury was swayed, and Darnay was acquitted. During the trial, both Carton and Darnay became acquainted with the Manettes. From that time on, they often visited the Manette's comfortable little house on Soho Square. Both men enjoyed the company of the good doctor, whose health of mind and body had been restored through Lucie's patient ministrations - and they also came to see Lucie. As suitors, their physical resemblance was never remarked upon because they were so different in attitude and demeanor. While Darnay, who had turned his back on his ancestral name and title, showed his refined upbringing in his confidence and courtliness, Carton seemed to be his own worst enemy. He was only confident of continued failure, and assured himself of it through drink, slovenliness and a morose character. Though Lucie elcomed them both, she was most drawn to Darnay. Being of a sympathetic and loving nature, she listened and wept one day as Carton, in uncharacteristic openness, confessed his love for her. He asked from her nothing in return because he believed even her love would not be enough to redeem him. The conversation ended with Carton's strange statement and promise: It is useless to say it,